Should I Leave My Boiler On Continuously?
“So what’s the truth, then?”
Our friendly boiler serviceman was a bit shocked.
But if anyone should know, he should.
So I continued…
“Haha. Don’t worry. I’m just curious about whether to leave our boiler on continually… or only put it on when we need it.”
“Ah…” he said, quite relieved that it was a question he could address.
“Let me tell you my own experience.”
Hmm.. nothing like personal experience. So I listened carefully.
“I actually tested this at home,” he said.
“In the winter, during the day we set the thermostat at 21 degrees.
“And when we go to bed, we set it to 15 degrees.”
He must have detected the curious look on my face, so he continued:
“That’s because, when the boiler’s up to temperature, it uses hardly any gas to maintain that temperature…
“And raising the temperature from a room that’s at 15-degrees back up to 21-degrees uses less gas than it would to heat it up from a stone-cold house.”
I still had that sceptical look. So he carried on…
“I tested it. It actually used less gas.”
You can’t argue with that, can you?
So as he left, I thanked him, gave him a tip (well, he did a good job on the boiler too, and he took the time to explain things as he serviced it), and then I went to make some notes for this blog.
But I was still sceptical.
I needed more proof.
Once an inquisitive engineer, always an inquisitive engineer…
Or just plain stubborn?
What Do The Experts Say About Heating?
A simple Google search took me to Uswitch, who threw a spanner into the works.
“Err, it’s a bit more complex than that,” said Uswitch (well not exactly like that because it wasn’t an actual conversation – but you know what I mean)…
Some heat loss will always occur due to the difference between the temperature outside your house and the temperature you are trying to maintain on the inside. The greater the heat loss from your home, the more energy you will need to maintain the inside temperature, which means that the cost of leaving your heating on all the time will be especially expensive.
So, in other words, if the house leaks heat (because it’s not well insulated) it could work out more expensive to leave the heating on continually.
Uswitch recommends cavity-wall insulation and adequate loft insulation to get around that problem.
But overall, they don’t subscribe to the idea of leaving the boiler on continually.
Typically the most energy-efficient approach to heating your home is to programme your heating system so that it comes on when you need it most.
How to Decide Whether to Leave Your Boiler on Constantly – or on a Timer
Their acid test is this:
Provided you have a well-insulated home…
Take meter readings at the beginning and end of the week, and leave the boiler on constantly for a week.
Then repeat the experiment using the timing-of-the boiler method.
And see which uses the least amount of gas.
One other thing I might add…
When your boiler is on continually, the electric pump will be running for more time.
So remember to take that into consideration.
The Money Saving Expert View
OK. So Uswitch sat on the fence a bit with that one.
So let’s see what Money Saving Expert reckons.
MSE asked the experts at the Energy Saving Trust:
They too tell us that heat is continually leaking from your house – and the amount of leakage depends on how good your insulation is.
So, according to the Energy Saving Trust, a timer is best, to help you heat up your home only when you need it.
But then MSE goes on to balance this with a view from other experts who say:
Every time the heating is turned off, condensation collects within the walls. This condensation can help conduct heat outside the home, they say – meaning you leak heat more quickly and so will use more energy as a result.
The Final Expert View on Heating
Let’s give the final word to the Centre For Sustainable Energy
With an impressive title like that, they should know what they’re talking about when it comes to saving money on energy costs.
No fluff here. Straight to the point.
Take it away CSE:
If you are out during the day (or tucked up in bed at night), you don’t need the heating on. Even if you turn your thermostat down a bit, your boiler will keep firing up and using energy (and cost you money) at times when you won’t feel the benefit. Instead, programme your central heating using the timer so that it switches off when you’re out or in bed, and switches back on to warm up the house about half an hour before you get home or before you get up.
So take from that what you like.
Here’s a summary of it:
- The heating engineer leaves his boiler on continually.
- Many experts say it’s cheaper to put the heating on only when you need it.
- Nearly everyone agrees that it’s important to insulate your house well in order to avoid heat loss.
- The acid test is to try each method for a week and see which works out cheaper (assuming, of course, that both weeks have similar outdoor temperatures to give it a fair comparison).
The balance of the arguments seems to favour the “switch on your heating when you need it” option.
But you’ll only know for sure by testing it out yourself.
“I Don’t Agree!”
As you might expect, this blog post caused quite a discussion on Social Media.
So I’ve added this extra section to look at some people’s own experiences… and what I discovered when I tested it out.
Her customers’ own experience made Christina disagree on Facebook…
And Kevin’s wife disagreed, too…
My Central Heating Test
So I tested it.
I ran the heating over 3 days, for…
- 2.5 hours
- 6 hours
- 12 hours
On each test, we heated the house from 12 degrees up to 20 degrees, and maintained it automatically at 20 degrees via the room thermostat.
This is how much the gas cost us…
So it appears, after all, that it is indeed cheaper (per hour) to run the heating for 12 hours straight, rather than a couple of hours here and there.
Now I haven’t included the cost of electricity – because we had some electrical items running during some tests but not during other tests. This is purely gas costs. So there’ll be a small additional cost to run the pump. Also, I haven’t included the standing charge – because you’d still have to pay the 11p or so, even if you shivered all winter!
The data certainly shows how much cheaper it is to maintain a warm house than heat it from stone cold.
Kevin, sorry mate, I think your wife was right after all.
Note: Besides these three tests, I made another two – over 15 hours and 16 hours. But the initial room temperatures were different (one was higher; the other, I suspect, was much lower), so the results were skewed. But if you’re interested, 15 hours was 15p/h, and 16 hours was 20p/h.
Our boiler is only a few years old. So it’s nice and efficient.
But an older boiler might cost a bit more to run.
Just something to bear in mind.
Save More Money With the Right Energy Tariff
Something else which could increase your heating cost is paying more for your gas than you need to.
So make sure you’re on the best energy tariff.
We thought they were all the same until we checked them out, swapped to a new provider, and saw our bills decrease dramatically.
So, as the saying goes, compare the market.
And don’t forget to go via a Cashback site to get some money back if you do change your energy provider.
As I write, Uswitch is offering up to £30 cashback on Quidco.
And Npower is offering £100 cashback on Topcashback.
Is it cheaper to run your central heating boiler continually, or only when you need it? Here's what the experts say... and the reality. Click To Tweet
Over to You
What about you?
After all, that’s what matters in the real world. How does it work for you? What’s your experience?
Share your thoughts. Write something in the comments box below. And let’s keep the conversation going.